Back to Rip City!

Since my most recent Blazer update, Portland has split its last six games and sits at 23-15, just two losses behind Denver for the division lead. One trend that is becoming clearer with each game is that Nate McMillan definitely wants to keep the pace down, especially playing with a thin bench. Portland has averaged about 93.5 possessions per game over the course of the entire season, but just 91 possessions since Przybilla went down. The Blazers are the slowest team in the league, and to put things into context, the next slowest teams are Detroit and Miami, who sit at 94.5 and 96.0, respectively.

Is the slow pace a good thing? It seems to be! Since Joel’s season-ending injury nine games ago, Portland is scoring nearly 1.1 points per possession, a figure that translates into 108 points per game (at an average pace) and matches the Suns for league-leading offensive efficiency. So why aren’t they leading the division? Defense.

Portland’s defensive efficiency was best in the league—allowing the least points per possession—before its two centers went down with injuries. Since then, the Blazer defense has allowed teams to score at will, with an efficiency (or lack thereof) that matches the league’s worst, Toronto. After losing two of the better shot blockers in the league, Portland went from allowing one of the league’s lowest opponents’ field goal percentages, to being merely at the league average. Quite a plunge for only 9 games.

Fortunately the offense has continued to pick up the slack for the undersized defense. If the Blazers can maintain their current levels of offensive and defensive efficiency, they should finish 25-19 over the last 44 games, give or take four wins. This likely gets them the 6th seed come playoff time, with the 4-seed being a best-case scenario, yet missing the playoffs still being a real possibility.

I thought a couple weeks ago that the 7th or 8th seed would be an optimistic prediction for these injury-ridden Blazers, but the last couple weeks have shown me that they can still compete at a high level, and the numbers support that. There are still a lot of games to be played, so enjoy!


One Response to Back to Rip City!

  1. WillB says:

    This makes one wonder whether Portland’s offensive efficiency is in part a by-product of its pace. Would the team be just as efficient at that end of the floor if McMillan asked his players to push the ball more? Or would a faster pace lead to a higher turnover rate, or less effective output from Roy/Aldridge, and thus a decrease in efficiency? These questions are worth asking because if the loss of Oden and Przybilla is indeed the cause of Portland’s defensive efficiency woes, and neither is expected back this year, then the Blazers may have nothing to gain from maintaining a slow pace of play. In other words, if they’re damned to playing defense as inefficiently as Phoenix or Toronto, but have the potential to score even more efficiently, why not attempt to maximize possessions by picking up the pace the way those teams do? Again, this would depend upon whether individual players (especially Roy and Aldridge) could maintain their current efficiency levels despite a change in tempo; I’m not sure they could. But in theory this is the direction the team should go in, right (perhaps not long-term, but at least until Oden and Przybilla return next season)?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: